1. Ideas and StrategyPRESENTATION TO *** BUSINESS PLAN COMPETITION PARTICIPANTS
2. TodayDeveloping an idea
Assessing your idea
Describing your strategy
A couple of wrinkles1
3. Developing an ideaWhy brainstorming usually fails
3 frameworks
Product trees
4 killer questions
The 5Cs model2
4. Unexpected usersHeavy usersPotential users blocked by one obstaclePotential users who differ in one way from current usersCreative bundling to eliminate complementsRadical distortions of key value equation components New uses for existing productsNew users for existing productsNew ways to meet existing needsStimulating new needs. . .radically modify existing products. . . generate radical increases in existing product sales . . . develop new productsSearch for killer product ideas by exploring opportunities to . . .Product idea tree3
5. What would it take to make my product at half the cost?Radical distortion of key value equation componentsCan I reduce by half or double my distribution cost?Could I offer my product at 5 times the cost if it had greater feature/function?Could I double my product depth or cut breadth in half? What input, if reduced by half the cost, would allow me to cut my price 20%?QuestionExisting exampleSouthwest Airlines
PC clonesPersonal shopper
Mail orderPremium ice creamPetSmart
Baby SuperstoreZinc in batteries
Low-rate credit cards for high credit ratingPotential idea6 packs of single-use, lightweight, disposable umbrellasDiscount realtorsA bank with home cash deliveryHome decorator superstoreIndustrial pawn shop for small business lendingProduct idea tree4
6. 1. What is the biggest hassle about this product?
For what subgroup of users . . .
For what subgroup of usages . . .
Etc.
2. What do the Batman movie, roller blades, and Ben and Jerry’s have in common?
3. How would I do things differently if I had perfect information?
4. Where are the search, order entry, and tracking costs a large percentage of total costs?4 killer questions5
7. Raw material suppliersVolumeCostsConcentrate surplus from suppliers2CostsCompete for surplus1ClientOEMCostsConcentrate surplus from channels2RetailerCapture surplus from customers3PriceCooperate to capture surplus5Create new demand4The 5Cs model6
8. TodayDeveloping an idea
Assessing your idea
How powerful?
How large?
Describing your strategy
A couple of wrinkles7
9. Create a new standard of performance that previously was not recognized as important but becomes one of the critical buying factors for a target marketInvent: create a new standardAccelerate pace of innovation in a critical performance dimension by 3-5 yearsInnovate: radically improve an existing important standardUnique performancePerformance enhancement8
10. * Compared to The Gap
** Compared to IBM and CompaqPercent below competitors50502020Home DepotAmazonStaplesOffice DepotOld Navy*CompUSADell**Gateway**CommodoreAmerica WestPeople ExpressE-PlusOrangeMobilcomRetailersPC manufacturersAirlinesTelecomIomega Zip DriveOtherAverage price discounts of 30-45%20-5020-8040503040-5050-7060-7030-5020-3015Price-based value propositions must offer extreme discount to market9
12. TodayDeveloping an idea
Assessing your idea
Describing your strategy
A couple of wrinkles11
13. A strong business concept . . .Where to competeHow to compete. . . driving a reinforcing business systemDeliverCommunicateDescribing your strategy12
14. Product range
Target customers
Channels
GeographyWhere to compete13
15. “The compelling reason why the target customer should buy your product instead of alternatives”Value proposition“Why competitors cannot copy you once it is obvious you are succeeding”Sustainable competitive advantage+How to compete14
16. Reinforcing business systemProvide the valueDesign product, processProcure, manu-factureDistributeServicePriceSales messageAdver-tisingPromotion, PRCommunicate the value15
17. TodayDeveloping an idea
Assessing your idea
Describing your strategy
A couple of wrinkles16
18. Real value
Absolute resource scarcity
True network externalities
False value
“Controlling the space”How valuable is the first mover advantage?17
19. Levels of rollout aggressivenessHigh
(“Big bet”)Low
(“boot strapper”)ReplicatorScalerLocalNationalNatural business scaleEstablish presence in many local markets simultaneouslyTarget relatively large percentage of national market from the outsetEstablish presence in local market or region, then move onto the nextInitially target small percentage of national market, then attempt to increase scale“Serial replicator”“Sneaky scaler”“Big bang”“Blitzkreig”4 primary models exist for rollout18
20. RiskVelocity of growth (in a given year)Function of
Management capacity
Capital available
Ability of company to replicate skills
Physical availability of scarce resources
Quality of management decision makingFunction of
Extent of “crowding” – how close are your competitors?
Scale advantages – when you do run into competition, how much scale/market capture is necessary to win?
Capturing scale resources – are there a limited number of key scarce resources (e.g., scientists, store locations) that you must capture? Determine level of rollout aggressiveness through careful balance of strategic and operating riskOperating riskStrategic risk19
21. RiskVelocity
Number of stores added in that year081234567With low strategic risk, company can afford to open optimal number of stores from operating risk standpointStrategic risk scenariosBut as strategic risk increases, companies
will be forced to increase expansion to a straining point in a “big bet”CONCEPTUALCATEGORY/KILLEREXAMPLEThe combination of these two provides direction on the aggressiveness of rollout20